LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Match 4 · draw

Sunday, 7 February 2010

ResultMatch 4

Single source
  1. 4
  2. 10
  3. 12
  4. 22

Jackpot$10,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules4/24 · since Jan 2010draw 38 of 6,130 under them

← 2010-02-06All recent draws2010-02-08 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed4 10 12 2229 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 7 February 2010 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

51oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 51 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 44% of every possible ticket.

  • sum44th
  • odd2th
  • low83th
  • widest gap67th
  • neighbours28th
  • spread71th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 6 of each

47times
103times
129times
224times

Every number was expected about that many times after 37 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Prize breakdown · 2010-02-07

  • Lines in play≈ 15kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$15.8Kto 1.8k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 9lines took a prize
  • Match 41 winnerchance said 1.4

Where the money went

  • Match 463%$10K
  • Match 316%$2.6K
  • Match 221%$3.3K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10kPrize each
  1. Match 41≈ 1.4 by chance$10,000
  2. Match 3

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 2 of 4 numbers (4, 12) with the draw of 5 February 2010 — its closest relative in 37 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 99% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (6 February 2010): nothing carried over. Chance says 54% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

48

The numbers add up to 48 — the 43th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 50. No two numbers side by side. 44% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

10 had not appeared for 11 draws. A number waits about 6 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.5× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
128≈ 114 by chance
$20.00
  • Match 21,627≈ 1.6k by chance$2.00
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈15k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 1,627 winners, 0% more than the 1.6k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 41$10,000
    Match 3128$20.00
    Match 21,627$2.00
    Totals1,756—