LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Match 4 · draw

Saturday, 6 February 2010

ResultMatch 4

Single source
  1. 5
  2. 9
  3. 19
  4. 23

Jackpot$10,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules4/24 · since Jan 2010draw 37 of 6,130 under them

← 2010-02-05All recent draws2010-02-07 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed5 9 19 2329 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 6 February 2010 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

58oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 58 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 60% of every possible ticket.

  • sum67th
  • odd98th
  • low50th
  • widest gap67th
  • neighbours28th
  • spread71th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 6 of each

55times
95times
194times
235times

Every number was expected about that many times after 36 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Prize breakdown · 2010-02-06

  • Lines in play≈ 23kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$7.9Kto 2.6k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 9lines took a prize
  • Match 40 winnerschance said 2.1

Where the money went

  • Match 338%$3K
  • Match 262%$4.9K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10kPrize each
  1. Match 40≈ 2.1 by chance$10,000
  2. Match 3150≈ 171 by chance

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 2 of 4 numbers (5, 9) with the draw of 3 February 2010 — its closest relative in 36 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 99% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (5 February 2010): nothing carried over. Chance says 54% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

56

The numbers add up to 56 — the 66th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 50. No two numbers side by side. 44% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

23 had not appeared for 5 draws. A number waits about 6 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.5× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
$20.00
  • Match 22,434≈ 2.4k by chance$2.00
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈23k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 2,434 winners, 0% more than the 2.4k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 40$10,000
    Match 3150$20.00
    Match 22,434$2.00
    Totals2,584—