LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Match 4 · draw

Tuesday, 28 February 2017

ResultMatch 4

Single source
  1. 8
  2. 18
  3. 19
  4. 22

Jackpot$80,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules4/24 · since Jan 2010draw 2,616 of 6,124 under them

← 2017-02-27All recent draws2017-03-01 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed8 18 19 2229 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 28 February 2017 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

47oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 47 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 35% of every possible ticket.

  • sum90th
  • odd17th
  • low17th
  • widest gap67th
  • neighbours75th
  • spread40th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 436 of each

8432times
18459times
19473times
22423times

Every number was expected about that many times after 2,615 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Prize breakdown · 2017-02-28

  • Lines in play≈ 18kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$86.3Kto 2.0k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 9lines took a prize
  • Match 48 winnerschance said 1.7

Where the money went

  • Match 493%$80.0K
  • Match 32.9%$2.5K
  • Match 24.4%$3.8K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10kPrize each
  1. Match 48≈ 1.7 by chance$10,000
  2. Match 3

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 4 numbers (18, 19, 22) with the draw of 20 March 2016 — its closest relative in 2,615 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 100% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (27 February 2017): nothing carried over. Chance says 54% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

67

The numbers add up to 67 — the 89th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 50. Side-by-side numbers: 18–19. 44% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

22 had not appeared for 30 draws. A number waits about 6 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.3× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
125≈ 134 by chance
$20.00
  • Match 21,906≈ 1.9k by chance$2.00
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈18k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 1,906 winners, 0% fewer than the 1.9k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 48$10,000
    Match 3125$20.00
    Match 21,906$2.00
    Totals2,039—