LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Match 4 · draw

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

ResultMatch 4

Single source
  1. 5
  2. 12
  3. 15
  4. 16

Jackpot$20,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules4/24 · since Jan 2010draw 2,217 of 6,123 under them

← 2016-01-25All recent draws2016-01-27 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed5 12 15 1629 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 26 January 2016 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

74oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 74 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 92% of every possible ticket.

  • sum44th
  • odd50th
  • low50th
  • widest gap33th
  • neighbours75th
  • spread21th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 369 of each

5367times
12353times
15374times
16378times

Every number was expected about that many times after 2,216 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Prize breakdown · 2016-01-26

  • Lines in play≈ 18kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$26.6Kto 2.1k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 9lines took a prize
  • Match 42 winnerschance said 1.7

Where the money went

  • Match 475%$20.0K
  • Match 310%$2.7K
  • Match 215%$3.9K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10kPrize each
  1. Match 42≈ 1.7 by chance$10,000
  2. Match 3

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

This exact draw has happened before, on 25 July 2010. Chance gave a match this close a 19% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (25 January 2016): nothing carried over. Chance says 54% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

48

The numbers add up to 48 — the 43th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 50. Side-by-side numbers: 15–16. 44% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

5 had not appeared for 5 draws. A number waits about 6 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.3× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
134≈ 136 by chance
$20.00
  • Match 21,945≈ 1.9k by chance$2.00
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈18k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 1,945 winners, 0% fewer than the 1.9k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 42$10,000
    Match 3134$20.00
    Match 21,945$2.00
    Totals2,081—