LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Match 4 · draw

Monday, 27 December 2010

ResultMatch 4

Single source
  1. 3
  2. 6
  3. 13
  4. 17

Jackpot$10,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules4/24 · since Jan 2010draw 361 of 6,127 under them

← 2010-12-26All recent draws2010-12-28 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed3 6 13 1729 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 27 December 2010 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

63oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 63 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 71% of every possible ticket.

  • sum20th
  • odd83th
  • low50th
  • widest gap33th
  • neighbours28th
  • spread40th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 60 of each

361times
675times
1357times
1747times

Every number was expected about that many times after 360 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Prize breakdown · 2010-12-27

  • Lines in play≈ 13kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$14.8Kto 1.5k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 9lines took a prize
  • Match 41 winnerchance said 1.3

Where the money went

  • Match 467%$10.0K
  • Match 313%$2.0K
  • Match 219%$2.9K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10kPrize each
  1. Match 41≈ 1.3 by chance$10,000
  2. Match 3

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 4 numbers (3, 6, 13) with the draw of 16 August 2010 — its closest relative in 360 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 94% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (26 December 2010): 13, 17 carried over. Chance says 54% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

39

The numbers add up to 39 — the 19th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 50. No two numbers side by side. 44% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

3 had not appeared for 12 draws. A number waits about 6 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.1× as often as an average ticket — about as popular as most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
98≈ 101 by chance
$20.00
  • Match 21,437≈ 1.4k by chance$2.00
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈13k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 1,437 winners, 0% more than the 1.4k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 41$10,000
    Match 398$20.00
    Match 21,437$2.00
    Totals1,536—