LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Match 4 · draw

Wednesday, 24 February 2010

ResultMatch 4

Single source
  1. 7
  2. 11
  3. 18
  4. 22

Jackpot$70,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules4/24 · since Jan 2010draw 55 of 6,130 under them

← 2010-02-23All recent draws2010-02-25 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed7 11 18 2229 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 24 February 2010 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

79oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 79 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 96% of every possible ticket.

  • sum72th
  • odd50th
  • low50th
  • widest gap33th
  • neighbours28th
  • spread48th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 9 of each

74times
1111times
189times
229times

Every number was expected about that many times after 54 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Prize breakdown · 2010-02-24

  • Lines in play≈ 19kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$77.2Kto 2.2k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 9lines took a prize
  • Match 47 winnerschance said 1.8

Where the money went

  • Match 491%$70K
  • Match 33.9%$3K
  • Match 25.4%$4.2K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10kPrize each
  1. Match 47≈ 1.8 by chance$10,000
  2. Match 3

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 2 of 4 numbers (7, 22) with the draw of 29 January 2010 — its closest relative in 54 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 100% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (23 February 2010): nothing carried over. Chance says 54% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

58

The numbers add up to 58 — the 71th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 50. No two numbers side by side. 44% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

18 had not appeared for 14 draws. A number waits about 6 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.5× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
152≈ 147 by chance
$20.00
  • Match 22,088≈ 2.1k by chance$2.00
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈19k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 2,088 winners, 0% more than the 2.1k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 47$10,000
    Match 3152$20.00
    Match 22,088$2.00
    Totals2,247—