LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Match 4 · draw

Sunday, 3 January 2010

ResultMatch 4

Single source
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 5
  4. 7

Jackpot$30,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules4/24 · since Jan 2010draw 3 of 6,130 under them

← 2010-01-02All recent draws2010-01-04 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed1 2 5 729 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 3 January 2010 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

17oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 17 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 1% of every possible ticket.

  • sum0th
  • odd83th
  • low98th
  • widest gap3th
  • neighbours75th
  • spread3th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 0 of each

10times
21time
50times
70times

Every number was expected about that many times after 2 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Prize breakdown · 2010-01-03

  • Lines in play≈ 18kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$37.6Kto 2.1k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 8lines took a prize
  • Match 43 winnerschance said 1.7

Where the money went

  • Match 480%$30K
  • Match 310%$3.8K
  • Match 210%$3.8K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10kPrize each
  1. Match 43≈ 1.7 by chance$10,000
  2. Match 3

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 1 of 4 numbers (2) with the draw of 2 January 2010 — its closest relative in 2 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 79% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (2 January 2010): 2 carried over. Chance says 54% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

15

The numbers add up to 15 — the 0th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 50. Side-by-side numbers: 1–2. 44% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

2 had not appeared for 1 draws. A number waits about 6 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.8× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
190≈ 134 by chance
$20.00
  • Match 21,903≈ 1.9k by chance$2.00
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈18k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 1,903 winners, 0% more than the 1.9k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 43$10,000
    Match 3190$20.00
    Match 21,903$2.00
    Totals2,096—