LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Texas Two Step · draw

Thursday, 10 March 2016

ResultTexas Two Step

Single source
  1. 26
  2. 27
  3. 29
  4. 34
  5. 18

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules4/35 + 1/35 · Jan 2010 – Feb 2022draw 646 of 1,266 under them

← 2016-03-07All recent draws2016-03-14 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed26 27 29 34 + 1829 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC
Drawn under earlier rules

Texas Two Step was a 4/35 + 1/35 · Jan 2010 – Feb 2022 game then. Everything on this page reads the draw against those rules and the 645 draws before it — not against today’s pool.

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 10 March 2016 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

25oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 25 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 5% of every possible ticket.

  • sum99th
  • odd48th
  • low2th
  • widest gap5th
  • neighbours83th
  • spread2th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 74 of each

2663times
2760times
2973times
3486times
Stars · a separate 1-of-35 machine

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Times drawn before — chance expected 18 of each

1817times

Every number was expected about that many times after 645 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 4 numbers (26, 27, 29) and 0 of 1 stars with the draw of 1 February 2016 — its closest relative in 645 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 79% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (7 March 2016): 29, 34 carried over. Chance says 40% of draws repeat at least one number. Stars: none repeated (3% expected).

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

116

The numbers add up to 116 — the 99th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 72. Side-by-side numbers: 26–27. 31% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

26 had not appeared for 11 draws. A number waits about 9 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 0.7× as often as an average ticket — less popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →