LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

2by2 · draw

Wednesday, 5 June 2019

Result2by2

Single source
  1. 3
  2. 15
  3. 21

Jackpot$22,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules3/26 · Nov 2016 – Sep 2022draw 567 of 1,768 under them

← 2019-06-04All recent draws2019-06-06 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed3 15 2129 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC
Drawn under earlier rules

2by2 was a 3/26 · Nov 2016 – Sep 2022 game then. Everything on this page reads the draw against those rules and the 566 draws before it — not against today’s pool.

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 5 June 2019 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

59oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 59 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 61% of every possible ticket.

  • sum46th
  • odd95th
  • low31th
  • widest gap69th
  • neighbours39th
  • spread76th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 65 of each

388times
1562times
2166times

Every number was expected about that many times after 566 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Prize breakdown · 2019-06-05

  • Lines in play≈ 27kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$6.0Kto 8.8k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 3lines took a prize
  • Match 335 winnerschance said 11

Where the money went

  • Match 358%$3.5K
  • Match 242%$2.5K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100kPrize each
  1. Match 335≈ 11 by chance$100
  2. Match 2836

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Its nearest twin

This exact draw has happened before, on 21 November 2016. Chance gave a match this close a 20% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (4 June 2019): 15 carried over. Chance says 32% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

39

The numbers add up to 39 — the 44th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 41. No two numbers side by side. 22% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

21 had not appeared for 10 draws. A number waits about 9 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.4× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
≈ 725 by chance
$3.00
  • Match 17,970≈ 8.0k by chance—
  • Match 40$22,000
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈27k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 836 winners, 15% more than the 725 an even spread gives. The numbers drawn were a little more popular than average — that is the crowd, not the machine.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 40$22,000
    Match 335$100
    Match 2836$3.00
    Match 17,970$0.00
    Totals8,841—