LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Wednesday, 8 February 2017

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 11
  2. 12
  3. 26
  4. 30
  5. 37
  6. 53

JackpotR$29,637,954

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 1,901 of 3,064 under them

← 2017-02-04All recent draws2017-02-11 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed11 12 26 30 37 5329 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 8 February 2017 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

69oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 69 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 87% of every possible ticket.

  • sum37th
  • odd50th
  • low78th
  • widest gap34th
  • neighbours75th
  • spread39th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 190 of each

11182times
12189times
26156times
30200times
37

Prize breakdown · 2017-02-08

  • Lines in play≈ 11Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$6.7Mto 4.7k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,303lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.22

Where the money went

  • Match 541%R$2.8M
  • Match 459%R$3.9M
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10M100MPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.22 by chanceR$29,637,954
  2. Match 5

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

194times
53220times

Every number was expected about that many times after 1,900 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 6 numbers (26, 30, 37) with the draw of 18 May 2016 — its closest relative in 1,900 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 100% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (4 February 2017): 11 carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

169

The numbers add up to 169 — the 36th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. Side-by-side numbers: 11–12. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

26 had not appeared for 23 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.3× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 69% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
60≈ 70 by chance
R$46,079
  • Match 44,645≈ 4.6k by chanceR$850
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈11M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 4,645 winners, 0% more than the 4.6k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 60R$29,637,954
    Match 560R$46,079
    Match 44,645R$850
    Totals4,705—