LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Saturday, 27 February 2016

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 1
  2. 5
  3. 34
  4. 37
  5. 40
  6. 60

JackpotR$2,942,618

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 1,794 of 3,064 under them

← 2016-02-24All recent draws2016-03-02 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed1 5 34 37 40 6029 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 27 February 2016 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

51oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 51 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 46% of every possible ticket.

  • sum44th
  • odd50th
  • low22th
  • widest gap92th
  • neighbours29th
  • spread100th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 179 of each

1176times
5209times
34182times
37180times
40

Prize breakdown · 2016-02-27

  • Lines in play≈ 8.3Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$6.8Mto 3.6k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,291lines took a prize
  • Match 61 winnerchance said 0.17

Where the money went

  • Match 643%R$2.9M
  • Match 523%R$1.6M
  • Match 433%R$2.3M
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10MPrize each
  1. Match 61≈ 0.17 by chanceR$2,942,618
  2. Match 5

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

166times
60170times

Every number was expected about that many times after 1,793 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 4 of 6 numbers (1, 5, 37, 40) with the draw of 4 January 2006 — its closest relative in 1,793 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 54% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (24 February 2016): nothing carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

177

The numbers add up to 177 — the 44th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. No two numbers side by side. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

37 had not appeared for 25 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 0.7× as often as an average ticket — less popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 82% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
64≈ 54 by chance
R$24,960
  • Match 43,568≈ 3.6k by chanceR$640
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈8.3M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 3,568 winners, 0% more than the 3.6k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 61R$2,942,618
    Match 564R$24,960
    Match 43,568R$640
    Totals3,633—