LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Thursday, 4 February 2016

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 1
  2. 5
  3. 13
  4. 25
  5. 26
  6. 29

JackpotR$34,017,361

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 1,787 of 3,064 under them

← 2016-02-02All recent draws2016-02-06 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed1 5 13 25 26 2929 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 4 February 2016 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

17oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 17 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 1% of every possible ticket.

  • sum2th
  • odd95th
  • low99th
  • widest gap12th
  • neighbours75th
  • spread6th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 179 of each

1175times
5208times
13187times
25158times
26

Prize breakdown · 2016-02-04

  • Lines in play≈ 21Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$40.1Mto 9.1k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,289lines took a prize
  • Match 62 winnerschance said 0.41

Where the money went

  • Match 685%R$34.0M
  • Match 56.2%R$2.5M
  • Match 48.9%R$3.6M
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10M100MPrize each
  1. Match 62≈ 0.41 by chanceR$17,008,681

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

145times
29190times

Every number was expected about that many times after 1,786 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 4 of 6 numbers (1, 5, 13, 25) with the draw of 24 March 2001 — its closest relative in 1,786 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 54% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (2 February 2016): 25 carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

99

The numbers add up to 99 — the 2th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. Side-by-side numbers: 25–26. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

13 had not appeared for 30 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 2.7× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 50% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
Match 5
167≈ 134 by chance
R$14,881
  • Match 48,897≈ 8.9k by chanceR$399
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈21M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 8,897 winners, 0% more than the 8.9k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 62R$17,008,681
    Match 5167R$14,881
    Match 48,897R$399
    Totals9,066—