LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Saturday, 4 February 2012

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 2
  2. 16
  3. 17
  4. 25
  5. 50
  6. 54

JackpotR$45,346,508

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 1,360 of 3,064 under them

← 2012-02-01All recent draws2012-02-08 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed2 16 17 25 50 5429 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 4 February 2012 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

46oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 46 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 33% of every possible ticket.

  • sum32th
  • odd22th
  • low78th
  • widest gap82th
  • neighbours75th
  • spread80th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 136 of each

2124times
16145times
17148times
25128times
50

Prize breakdown · 2012-02-04

  • Lines in play≈ 23Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$53.5Mto 10.0k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,306lines took a prize
  • Match 62 winnerschance said 0.46

Where the money went

  • Match 685%R$45.3M
  • Match 56.3%R$3.4M
  • Match 49.0%R$4.8M
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10M100MPrize each
  1. Match 62≈ 0.46 by chanceR$22,673,254

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

144times
54150times

Every number was expected about that many times after 1,359 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 4 of 6 numbers (2, 16, 50, 54) with the draw of 18 January 2006 — its closest relative in 1,359 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 45% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (1 February 2012): 17 carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

164

The numbers add up to 164 — the 32th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. Side-by-side numbers: 16–17. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

25 had not appeared for 26 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.2× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 71% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
Match 5
112≈ 149 by chance
R$30,005
  • Match 49,880≈ 9.9k by chanceR$486
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈23M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 9,880 winners, 0% more than the 9.9k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 62R$22,673,254
    Match 5112R$30,005
    Match 49,880R$486
    Totals9,994—