LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 1
  2. 5
  3. 6
  4. 17
  5. 31
  6. 50

JackpotR$19,241,182

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 1,045 of 3,064 under them

← 2009-01-31All recent draws2009-02-07 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed1 5 6 17 31 5029 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 4 February 2009 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

50oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 50 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 43% of every possible ticket.

  • sum4th
  • odd78th
  • low78th
  • widest gap53th
  • neighbours75th
  • spread68th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 104 of each

1103times
5122times
695times
17117times
31

Prize breakdown · 2009-02-04

  • Lines in play≈ 20Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$3.6Mto 8.7k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,305lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.40

Where the money went

  • Match 550%R$1.8M
  • Match 450%R$1.8M
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10M100MPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.40 by chanceR$19,241,182
  2. Match 5

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

103times
50108times

Every number was expected about that many times after 1,044 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 6 numbers (5, 6, 17) with the draw of 24 December 2008 — its closest relative in 1,044 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 100% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (31 January 2009): nothing carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

110

The numbers add up to 110 — the 3th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. Side-by-side numbers: 5–6. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

50 had not appeared for 76 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 2.1× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 57% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
102≈ 130 by chance
R$17,542
  • Match 48,623≈ 8.6k by chanceR$208
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈20M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 8,623 winners, 0% more than the 8.6k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 60R$19,241,182
    Match 5102R$17,542
    Match 48,623R$208
    Totals8,725—