LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Saturday, 4 March 2006

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 20
  2. 23
  3. 25
  4. 32
  5. 54
  6. 60

JackpotR$3,211,525

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 743 of 3,065 under them

← 2006-03-01All recent draws2006-03-08 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed20 23 25 32 54 6029 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 4 March 2006 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

62oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 62 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 73% of every possible ticket.

  • sum77th
  • odd22th
  • low50th
  • widest gap70th
  • neighbours29th
  • spread32th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 74 of each

2064times
2386times
2574times
3283times
54

Prize breakdown · 2006-03-04

  • Lines in play≈ 6.4Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$1.6Mto 2.8k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,309lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.13

Where the money went

  • Match 550%R$825.8K
  • Match 450%R$822.6K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10MPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.13 by chanceR$3,211,525
  2. Match 5

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

84times
6066times

Every number was expected about that many times after 742 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 6 numbers (23, 25, 60) with the draw of 7 May 2005 — its closest relative in 742 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 100% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (1 March 2006): nothing carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

214

The numbers add up to 214 — the 77th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. No two numbers side by side. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

20 had not appeared for 70 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 0.8× as often as an average ticket — less popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 79% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
28≈ 42 by chance
R$29,491
  • Match 42,762≈ 2.8k by chanceR$298
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈6.4M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 2,762 winners, 0% more than the 2.8k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 60R$3,211,525
    Match 528R$29,491
    Match 42,762R$298
    Totals2,790—