LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Wednesday, 1 February 2006

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 27
  2. 29
  3. 43
  4. 44
  5. 45
  6. 54

JackpotR$16,726,570

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 734 of 3,064 under them

← 2006-01-28All recent draws2006-02-04 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed27 29 43 44 45 5429 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 1 February 2006 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

27oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 27 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 6% of every possible ticket.

  • sum93th
  • odd78th
  • low22th
  • widest gap21th
  • neighbours96th
  • spread5th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 73 of each

2768times
2978times
4381times
4468times
45

Prize breakdown · 2006-02-01

  • Lines in play≈ 9.3Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$19.0Mto 4.0k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,298lines took a prize
  • Match 61 winnerchance said 0.19

Where the money went

  • Match 688%R$16.7M
  • Match 55.9%R$1.1M
  • Match 45.9%R$1.1M
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10M100MPrize each
  1. Match 61≈ 0.19 by chanceR$16,726,570

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

73times
5482times

Every number was expected about that many times after 733 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 6 numbers (27, 43, 54) with the draw of 27 May 2000 — its closest relative in 733 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 100% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (28 January 2006): 43 carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

242

The numbers add up to 242 — the 92th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. Side-by-side numbers: 43–44, 44–45. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

29 had not appeared for 18 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 0.5× as often as an average ticket — less popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 86% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
Match 5
58≈ 60 by chance
R$19,354
  • Match 43,984≈ 4.0k by chanceR$281
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈9.3M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 3,984 winners, 0% more than the 4.0k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 61R$16,726,570
    Match 558R$19,354
    Match 43,984R$281
    Totals4,043—