LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Wednesday, 9 March 2005

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 3
  2. 24
  3. 48
  4. 52
  5. 53
  6. 54

JackpotR$13,192,071

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 645 of 3,065 under them

← 2005-03-05All recent draws2005-03-12 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed3 24 48 52 53 5429 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 9 March 2005 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

34oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 34 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 13% of every possible ticket.

  • sum89th
  • odd22th
  • low22th
  • widest gap79th
  • neighbours96th
  • spread76th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 64 of each

355times
2474times
4850times
5266times
53

Prize breakdown · 2005-03-09

  • Lines in play≈ 10Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$2.1Mto 4.4k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,312lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.20

Where the money went

  • Match 550%R$1.1M
  • Match 450%R$1.1M
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10M100MPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.20 by chanceR$13,192,071
  2. Match 5

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

74times
5471times

Every number was expected about that many times after 644 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 4 of 6 numbers (3, 24, 48, 52) with the draw of 12 March 2003 — its closest relative in 644 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 24% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (5 March 2005): nothing carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

234

The numbers add up to 234 — the 89th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. Side-by-side numbers: 52–53, 53–54. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

3 had not appeared for 25 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 0.6× as often as an average ticket — less popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 83% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
39≈ 66 by chance
R$27,310
  • Match 44,345≈ 4.3k by chanceR$244
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈10M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 4,345 winners, 0% more than the 4.3k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 60R$13,192,071
    Match 539R$27,310
    Match 44,345R$244
    Totals4,384—