LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Wednesday, 4 June 2003

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 5
  2. 6
  3. 23
  4. 25
  5. 39
  6. 51

JackpotR$3,835,668

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 468 of 3,064 under them

← 2003-05-31All recent draws2003-06-07 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed5 6 23 25 39 5129 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 4 June 2003 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

53oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 53 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 49% of every possible ticket.

  • sum21th
  • odd95th
  • low78th
  • widest gap40th
  • neighbours75th
  • spread55th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 47 of each

559times
641times
2359times
2548times
39

Prize breakdown · 2003-06-04

  • Lines in play≈ 11Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$1.7Mto 4.8k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,304lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.22

Where the money went

  • Match 550%R$829.0K
  • Match 450%R$825.8K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10MPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.22 by chanceR$3,835,668
  2. Match 5

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

27times
5151times

Every number was expected about that many times after 467 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 4 of 6 numbers (6, 23, 39, 51) with the draw of 14 August 1999 — its closest relative in 467 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 18% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (31 May 2003): nothing carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

149

The numbers add up to 149 — the 20th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. Side-by-side numbers: 5–6. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

25 had not appeared for 21 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.3× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 70% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
58≈ 71 by chance
R$14,293
  • Match 44,701≈ 4.7k by chanceR$176
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈11M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 4,701 winners, 0% more than the 4.7k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 60R$3,835,668
    Match 558R$14,293
    Match 44,701R$176
    Totals4,759—