LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Wednesday, 26 February 2003

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 2
  2. 10
  3. 15
  4. 21
  5. 58
  6. 59

JackpotR$17,701,023

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 441 of 3,065 under them

← 2003-02-22All recent draws2003-03-01 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed2 10 15 21 58 5929 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 26 February 2003 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

45oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 45 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 31% of every possible ticket.

  • sum33th
  • odd50th
  • low78th
  • widest gap99th
  • neighbours75th
  • spread96th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 44 of each

235times
1043times
1533times
2142times
58

Prize breakdown · 2003-02-26

  • Lines in play≈ 16Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$2.9Mto 7.1k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,292lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.32

Where the money went

  • Match 550%R$1.4M
  • Match 450%R$1.4M
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10M100MPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.32 by chanceR$17,701,023
  2. Match 5

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

44times
5942times

Every number was expected about that many times after 440 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 6 numbers (2, 21, 58) with the draw of 24 June 2000 — its closest relative in 440 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 99% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (22 February 2003): nothing carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

165

The numbers add up to 165 — the 33th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. Side-by-side numbers: 58–59. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

2 had not appeared for 28 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.3× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 69% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
121≈ 105 by chance
R$11,918
  • Match 46,941≈ 6.9k by chanceR$207
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈16M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 6,941 winners, 0% more than the 6.9k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 60R$17,701,023
    Match 5121R$11,918
    Match 46,941R$207
    Totals7,062—