LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Wednesday, 4 September 2002

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 6
  2. 12
  3. 35
  4. 36
  5. 40
  6. 50

JackpotR$510,254

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 393 of 3,065 under them

← 2002-08-31All recent draws2002-09-07 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed6 12 35 36 40 5029 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 4 September 2002 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

57oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 57 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 60% of every possible ticket.

  • sum46th
  • odd5th
  • low22th
  • widest gap75th
  • neighbours75th
  • spread47th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 39 of each

635times
1243times
3540times
3633times
40

Prize breakdown · 2002-09-04

  • Lines in play≈ 4.5Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$848.8Kto 2.0k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,296lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.09

Where the money went

  • Match 550%R$425.2K
  • Match 450%R$423.6K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1MPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.09 by chanceR$510,254
  2. Match 5

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

43times
5038times

Every number was expected about that many times after 392 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 4 of 6 numbers (6, 12, 35, 50) with the draw of 8 April 2000 — its closest relative in 392 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 16% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (31 August 2002): nothing carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

179

The numbers add up to 179 — the 46th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. Side-by-side numbers: 35–36. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

6 had not appeared for 27 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 0.7× as often as an average ticket — less popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 82% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
31≈ 29 by chance
R$13,717
  • Match 41,949≈ 1.9k by chanceR$217
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈4.5M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 1,949 winners, 0% more than the 1.9k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 60R$510,254
    Match 531R$13,717
    Match 41,949R$217
    Totals1,980—