LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLER🇬🇧 0808 8020 133🇨🇦 1-866-531-2600🇦🇺 1800 858 858all helplines →

Mega-Sena · draw

Saturday, 5 August 2000

ResultMega-Sena

Single source
  1. 16
  2. 27
  3. 36
  4. 42
  5. 44
  6. 59

JackpotR$11,481,752

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/60 · since Mar 1996draw 231 of 3,064 under them

← 2000-07-29All recent draws2000-08-12 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed16 27 36 42 44 5929 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 5 August 2000 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

53oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 53 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 50% of every possible ticket.

  • sum84th
  • odd22th
  • low22th
  • widest gap27th
  • neighbours29th
  • spread43th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 23 of each

1625times
2723times
3620times
4231times
44

Prize breakdown · 2000-08-05

  • Lines in play≈ 22Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid outR$3.2Mto 9.6k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2,302lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.44

Where the money went

  • Match 550%R$1.6M
  • Match 450%R$1.6M
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10M100MPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.44 by chanceR$11,481,752
  2. Match 5

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

28times
5924times

Every number was expected about that many times after 230 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 6 numbers (42, 44, 59) with the draw of 16 November 1997 — its closest relative in 230 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 91% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (29 July 2000): 44 carried over. Chance says 48% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

224

The numbers add up to 224 — the 84th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 183. No two numbers side by side. 42% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

36 had not appeared for 11 draws. A number waits about 10 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 0.5× as often as an average ticket — less popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 86% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
125≈ 143 by chance
R$12,896
  • Match 49,458≈ 9.5k by chanceR$170
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈22M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 9,458 winners, 0% more than the 9.5k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 60R$11,481,752
    Match 5125R$12,896
    Match 49,458R$170
    Totals9,583—