LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Lotto · draw

Saturday, 6 November 2010

ResultLotto

Single source
  1. 2
  2. 10
  3. 16
  4. 17
  5. 21
  6. 30

Jackpot$5,700,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/49 · since Jan 2010draw 133 of 2,629 under them

← 2010-11-03All recent draws2010-11-08 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed2 10 16 17 21 3029 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 6 November 2010 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

28oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 28 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 7% of every possible ticket.

  • sum5th
  • odd20th
  • low94th
  • widest gap8th
  • neighbours70th
  • spread16th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 16 of each

219times
1013times
1613times
1714times
2119times
3015times

Every number was expected about that many times after 132 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 6 numbers (2, 10, 17) with the draw of 6 March 2010 — its closest relative in 132 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 92% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (3 November 2010): 16, 30 carried over. Chance says 56% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

96

The numbers add up to 96 — the 5th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 150. Side-by-side numbers: 16–17. 50% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

10 had not appeared for 24 draws. A number waits about 8 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 3.0× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 15% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →

Prize breakdown · 2010-11-06

  • Lines in play≈ 967kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$102.9Kto 18k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 53lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.07

Where the money went

  • Match 520%$21K
  • Match 430%$30.7K
  • Match 350%$51.2K
Tier1101001k10k100kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10MPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.07 by chance$5,700,000
  2. Match 521≈ 18 by chance$1,000
  3. Match 41,024≈ 937 by chance$30.00
  4. Match 317,073≈ 17k by chance$3.00
  • Winners, log scale
  • Prize each, log scale
  • Where chance put the count

The rings take the ≈967k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 1,024 winners, 9% more than the 937 an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

Show the published table
MatchWinnersPrize each
Match 60$5,700,000
Match 521$1,000
Match 41,024$30.00
Match 317,073$3.00
Totals18,118—