LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Hit 5 · draw

Monday, 18 April 2016

ResultHit 5

Single source
  1. 4
  2. 27
  3. 29
  4. 31
  5. 35

Jackpot$220,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules5/39 · Jan 2010 – Sep 2020draw 986 of 1,676 under them

← 2016-04-16All recent draws2016-04-20 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed4 27 29 31 3529 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC
Drawn under earlier rules

Hit 5 was a 5/39 · Jan 2010 – Sep 2020 game then. Everything on this page reads the draw against those rules and the 985 draws before it — not against today’s pool.

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 18 April 2016 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

32oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 32 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 11% of every possible ticket.

  • sum86th
  • odd89th
  • low9th
  • widest gap96th
  • neighbours28th
  • spread70th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 126 of each

4124times
27138times
29104times
31122times
35148times

Every number was expected about that many times after 985 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 5 numbers (27, 31, 35) with the draw of 18 November 2015 — its closest relative in 985 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 100% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (16 April 2016): 27 carried over. Chance says 52% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

126

The numbers add up to 126 — the 85th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 100. No two numbers side by side. 44% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

31 had not appeared for 14 draws. A number waits about 8 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 0.9× as often as an average ticket — about as popular as most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 2% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →

Prize breakdown · 2016-04-18

  • Lines in play≈ 128kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$29.1Kto 14k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 9lines took a prize
  • Match 50 winnerschance said 0.22

Where the money went

  • Match 414%$4.1K
  • Match 340%$11.7K
  • Match 246%$13.3K
Tier1101001k10k100kWinners1101001k10k100k1MPrize each
  1. Match 50≈ 0.22 by chance$220,000
  2. Match 441≈ 38 by chance$100
  3. Match 31,174≈ 1.2k by chance$10.00
  4. Match 213,276≈ 13k by chance$1.00
  • Winners, log scale
  • Prize each, log scale
  • Where chance put the count

The rings take the ≈128k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 3 — 1,174 winners, 6% fewer than the 1.2k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

Show the published table
MatchWinnersPrize each
Match 50$220,000
Match 441$100
Match 31,174$10.00
Match 213,276$1.00
Totals14,491—

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →