LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Florida Lotto · draw

Wednesday, 27 January 2016

ResultFlorida Lotto

Single source
  1. 1
  2. 10
  3. 22
  4. 24
  5. 29
  6. 48

Jackpot$36,000,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/53 · since Jan 2010draw 634 of 2,087 under them

← 2016-01-23All recent draws2016-01-30 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed1 10 22 24 29 4829 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 27 January 2016 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

46oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 46 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 35% of every possible ticket.

  • sum22th
  • odd20th
  • low77th
  • widest gap68th
  • neighbours27th
  • spread85th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 72 of each

175times
1068times
2265times
2473times
2977times
4887times

Every number was expected about that many times after 633 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 4 of 6 numbers (10, 22, 24, 48) with the draw of 29 April 2015 — its closest relative in 633 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 37% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (23 January 2016): 24 carried over. Chance says 53% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

134

The numbers add up to 134 — the 22th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 162. No two numbers side by side. 47% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

1 had not appeared for 9 draws. A number waits about 9 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.6× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 42% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →

Prize breakdown · 2016-01-27

  • Lines in play≈ 2.3Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$393.0Kto 34k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 67lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.10

Where the money went

  • Match 533%$127.9K
  • Match 427%$104.6K
  • Match 341%$160.6K
Tier1101001k10k100kWinners1101001k10k100k1M10M100MPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.10 by chance$36,000,000
  2. Match 524≈ 28 by chance$5,328
  3. Match 41,622≈ 1.6k by chance$64.50
  4. Match 332,114≈ 32k by chance$5.00
  • Winners, log scale
  • Prize each, log scale
  • Where chance put the count

The rings take the ≈2.3M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 1,622 winners, 1% more than the 1.6k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

Show the published table
MatchWinnersPrize each
Match 60$36,000,000
Match 5 (XTRA Ticket)0—
Match 524$5,328
Match 4 (XTRA Ticket)0—
Match 41,622$64.50
Match 3 (XTRA Ticket)0—
Match 332,114$5.00
Match 2 (XTRA Ticket)0—
Totals0—

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →