LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

Lotto · draw

Friday, 28 January 2011

ResultLotto

Single source
  1. 12
  2. 17
  3. 22
  4. 28
  5. 37
  6. 44

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/44 · since Jan 2010draw 113 of 1,751 under them

← 2011-01-25All recent draws2011-02-01 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed12 17 22 28 37 4429 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 28 January 2011 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

57oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 57 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 61% of every possible ticket.

  • sum80th
  • odd21th
  • low50th
  • widest gap13th
  • neighbours23th
  • spread44th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 15 of each

1222times
1718times
2211times
2812times
3718times
4419times

Every number was expected about that many times after 112 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 4 of 6 numbers (12, 17, 37, 44) with the draw of 20 April 2010 — its closest relative in 112 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 16% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (25 January 2011): 12, 44 carried over. Chance says 61% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

160

The numbers add up to 160 — the 79th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 135. No two numbers side by side. 54% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

22 had not appeared for 13 draws. A number waits about 7 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 0.8× as often as an average ticket — less popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 30% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →

Prize breakdown · 2011-01-28

  • Lines in play≈ 205kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$41.4Kto 5.2k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 39lines took a prize
  • Match 52 winnerschance said 6.6

Where the money went

  • Match 535%$14.6K
  • Match 441%$17.0K
  • Match 324%$9.8K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10kPrize each
  1. Match 52≈ 6.6 by chance$7,304
  2. Match 4298≈ 307 by chance$57.00
  3. Match 34,910≈ 4.9k by chance$2.00
  • Winners, log scale
  • Prize each, log scale
  • Where chance put the count

The rings take the ≈205k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 3 — 4,910 winners, 0% more than the 4.9k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

Show the published table
MatchWinnersPrize each
Match 60—
Match 52$7,304
Match 4298$57.00
Match 34,910$2.00
Totals5,210—