LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

2by2 · draw

Saturday, 4 February 2017

Result2by2

Single source
  1. 7
  2. 17
  3. 25

Jackpot$22,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules3/26 · Nov 2016 – Sep 2022draw 81 of 1,768 under them

← 2017-02-03All recent draws2017-02-05 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed7 17 2529 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC
Drawn under earlier rules

2by2 was a 3/26 · Nov 2016 – Sep 2022 game then. Everything on this page reads the draw against those rules and the 80 draws before it — not against today’s pool.

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 4 February 2017 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

57oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 57 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 56% of every possible ticket.

  • sum74th
  • odd95th
  • low31th
  • widest gap54th
  • neighbours39th
  • spread76th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 9 of each

78times
1710times
2512times

Every number was expected about that many times after 80 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Prize breakdown · 2017-02-04

  • Lines in play≈ 25kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$4.5Kto 7.9k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 3lines took a prize
  • Match 324 winnerschance said 9.5

Where the money went

  • Match 354%$2.4K
  • Match 246%$2.1K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100kPrize each
  1. Match 324≈ 9.5 by chance$100
  2. Match 2686

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Its nearest twin

Shares 1 of 3 numbers (7) with the draw of 27 December 2016 — its closest relative in 80 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 89% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (3 February 2017): nothing carried over. Chance says 32% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

49

The numbers add up to 49 — the 73th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 41. No two numbers side by side. 22% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

7 had not appeared for 32 draws. A number waits about 9 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.5× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
≈ 656 by chance
$3.00
  • Match 17,216≈ 7.2k by chance—
  • Match 40$22,000
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈25k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 686 winners, 5% more than the 656 an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 40$22,000
    Match 324$100
    Match 2686$3.00
    Match 17,216$0.00
    Totals7,926—