LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

2by2 · draw

Sunday, 1 January 2017

Result2by2

Single source
  1. 9
  2. 11
  3. 19

Jackpot$22,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules3/26 · Nov 2016 – Sep 2022draw 47 of 1,768 under them

← 2016-12-31All recent draws2017-01-02 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed9 11 1929 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC
Drawn under earlier rules

2by2 was a 3/26 · Nov 2016 – Sep 2022 game then. Everything on this page reads the draw against those rules and the 46 draws before it — not against today’s pool.

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 1 January 2017 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

63oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 63 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 73% of every possible ticket.

  • sum46th
  • odd95th
  • low70th
  • widest gap38th
  • neighbours39th
  • spread30th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 5 of each

97times
119times
196times

Every number was expected about that many times after 46 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Prize breakdown · 2017-01-01

  • Lines in play≈ 17kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$3.5Kto 5.7k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 3lines took a prize
  • Match 317 winnerschance said 6.7

Where the money went

  • Match 348%$1.7K
  • Match 252%$1.8K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100kPrize each
  1. Match 317≈ 6.7 by chance$100
  2. Match 2612

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Its nearest twin

Shares 2 of 3 numbers (11, 19) with the draw of 13 December 2016 — its closest relative in 46 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 72% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (31 December 2016): 9 carried over. Chance says 32% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

39

The numbers add up to 39 — the 44th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 41. No two numbers side by side. 22% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

19 had not appeared for 17 draws. A number waits about 9 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.6× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
≈ 460 by chance
$3.00
  • Match 15,061≈ 5.1k by chance—
  • Match 40$22,000
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈17k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 1 — 5,061 winners, 0% fewer than the 5.1k an even spread gives. The real crowd and an even spread agreed closely on this draw.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 40$22,000
    Match 317$100
    Match 2612$3.00
    Match 15,061$0.00
    Totals5,690—