LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

2by2 · draw

Sunday, 1 January 2012

Result2by2

Single source
  1. 8
  2. 20
  3. 23
  4. 24

Jackpot$22,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules4/26 · Jan 2010 – Nov 2016draw 726 of 2,502 under them

← 2011-12-31All recent draws2012-01-02 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed8 20 23 2429 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC
Drawn under earlier rules

2by2 was a 4/26 · Jan 2010 – Nov 2016 game then. Everything on this page reads the draw against those rules and the 725 draws before it — not against today’s pool.

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 1 January 2012 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

45oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 45 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 29% of every possible ticket.

  • sum93th
  • odd17th
  • low17th
  • widest gap76th
  • neighbours77th
  • spread46th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 112 of each

8128times
20108times
23105times
2499times

Every number was expected about that many times after 725 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Prize breakdown · 2012-01-01

  • Lines in play≈ 11kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$24.8Kto 5.1k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2lines took a prize
  • Match 41 winnerchance said 0.75

Where the money went

  • Match 489%$22.0K
  • Match 35.6%$1.4K
  • Match 25.6%$1.4K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100kPrize each
  1. Match 41≈ 0.75 by chance$22,000
  2. Match 3

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 3 of 4 numbers (8, 20, 23) with the draw of 19 December 2011 — its closest relative in 725 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 99% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (31 December 2011): nothing carried over. Chance says 51% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

75

The numbers add up to 75 — the 92th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 54. Side-by-side numbers: 23–24. 41% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

8 had not appeared for 11 draws. A number waits about 7 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.4× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
14≈ 66 by chance
$100
  • Match 2463≈ 1.0k by chance$3.00
  • Match 14,604≈ 4.6k by chance—
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈11k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 463 winners, 55% fewer than the 1.0k an even spread gives. The numbers drawn were noticeably less popular than average — a draw full of birthdays makes more small winners, a draw of high numbers fewer. That is the crowd, not the machine.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 41$22,000
    Match 314$100
    Match 2463$3.00
    Match 14,604$0.00
    Totals5,082—