LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇺🇸 1-800-GAMBLERall helplines →

2by2 · draw

Friday, 1 January 2010

Result2by2

Single source
  1. 9
  2. 14
  3. 17
  4. 26

Jackpot$22,000

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules4/26 · Jan 2010 – Nov 2016draw 1 of 2,502 under them

First on recordAll recent draws2010-01-02 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed9 14 17 2629 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC
Drawn under earlier rules

2by2 was a 4/26 · Jan 2010 – Nov 2016 game then. Everything on this page reads the draw against those rules and the 0 draws before it — not against today’s pool.

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 1 January 2010 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

71oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 71 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 87% of every possible ticket.

  • sum80th
  • odd50th
  • low17th
  • widest gap48th
  • neighbours30th
  • spread53th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 0 of each

90times
140times
170times
260times

Every number was expected about that many times after 0 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Prize breakdown · 2010-01-01

  • Lines in play≈ 11kas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out$24.3Kto 4.9k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 2lines took a prize
  • Match 41 winnerchance said 0.72

Where the money went

  • Match 491%$22.0K
  • Match 33.7%$900.0
  • Match 25.7%$1.4K
Tier1101001k10kWinners1101001k10k100kPrize each
  1. Match 41≈ 0.72 by chance$22,000
  2. Match 3

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

No earlier draws to compare against yet.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

66

The numbers add up to 66 — the 79th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 54. No two numbers side by side. 41% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

Every number here is appearing for the first time.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 1.3× as often as an average ticket — more popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 0% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →
9≈ 63 by chance
$100
  • Match 2458≈ 997 by chance$3.00
  • Match 14,431≈ 4.4k by chance—
    • Winners, log scale
    • Prize each, log scale
    • Where chance put the count

    The rings take the ≈11k lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 2 — 458 winners, 54% fewer than the 997 an even spread gives. The numbers drawn were noticeably less popular than average — a draw full of birthdays makes more small winners, a draw of high numbers fewer. That is the crowd, not the machine.

    Show the published table
    MatchWinnersPrize each
    Match 41$22,000
    Match 39$100
    Match 2458$3.00
    Match 14,431$0.00
    Totals4,899—