LotteryOracle
GamesForecastPlaygroundCase filesMy numbers

Loading…

Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.

LotteryOracle

LotteryOracle reports what happened; it does not predict what is next. Every draw is independent — no number is ever "due".

GamesPlaygroundCase filesThe weekDataAboutMethodologyPrivacy
Built byejoyful

Responsible play.A lottery costs more than it pays back; if it stops being fun, help is free and confidential:🇮🇹 800 558 822all helplines →

SuperEnalotto · draw

Wednesday, 4 September 2002

ResultSuperEnalotto

Single source
  1. 10
  2. 41
  3. 52
  4. 53
  5. 61
  6. 88
  7. 89

The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick

Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at

Rules6/90 + 1/90 · Dec 1997 – Jul 2009draw 498 of 1,425 under them

← 2002-08-31All recent draws2002-09-07 →

Where this result came from

SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC.

  • Primarycommercial feed10 41 52 53 61 88 + 8929 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC
Drawn under earlier rules

SuperEnalotto was a 6/90 + 1/90 · Dec 1997 – Jul 2009 game then. Everything on this page reads the draw against those rules and the 497 draws before it — not against today’s pool.

Play these numbers? Read them as your ticket →

This draw, read by every tool

What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 4 September 2002 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.

59oddordinary

How ordinary this draw is

Scored 59 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 62% of every possible ticket.

  • sum69th
  • odd50th
  • low22th
  • widest gap63th
  • neighbours83th
  • spread81th
Draw Fingerprints →

Each number, as it stood before this draw

Times drawn before — chance expected 33 of each

1032times
4129times
5223times
5337times
6131times
8851times

Every number was expected about that many times after 497 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.

Frequency Explorer →

Its nearest twin

Shares 2 of 6 numbers (41, 52) with the draw of 23 January 2002 — its closest relative in 497 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 100% likelihood somewhere in that history.

From the draw just before (31 August 2002): nothing carried over. Chance says 35% of draws repeat at least one number.

Carry-over / Déjà Vu →

Sum and shape

305

The numbers add up to 305 — the 69th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 273. Side-by-side numbers: 52–53. 30% of draws have at least one such pair.

Sum Distribution →

The longest wait in this draw

61 had not appeared for 35 draws. A number waits about 15 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.

Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →

How many people held it

A line like this is played about 0.6× as often as an average ticket — less popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 98% of the jackpot.

Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.

The Unpopular Numbers Edge →

Prize breakdown · 2002-09-04

  • Lines in play≈ 59Mas the winner counts imply
  • Paid out€6.6Mto 177k winning lines
  • Won something1 in 330lines took a prize
  • Match 60 winnerschance said 0.09

Where the money went

  • Match 533%€2.2M
  • Match 433%€2.2M
  • Match 333%€2.2M
Tier1101001k10k100k1MWinners1101001k10k100kPrize each
  1. Match 60≈ 0.09 by chanceno winners
  2. Match 5 + Jolly0≈ 0.57 by chanceno winners
  3. Match 537≈ 47 by chance€59,716
  4. Match 44,324≈ 4.9k by chance€511
  5. Match 3173,088≈ 179k by chance€12.76
  • Winners, log scale
  • Prize each, log scale
  • Where chance put the count

The rings take the ≈59M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 4,324 winners, 12% fewer than the 4.9k an even spread gives. The numbers drawn were a little less popular than average — that is the crowd, not the machine.

Show the published table
MatchWinnersPrize each
Match 60€0.00
Match 5 + Jolly0€0.00
Match 537€59,716
Match 44,324€511
Match 3173,088€12.76
Totals0—