Loading…
Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.
Loading…
Reading the draws and working out what chance predicts.
SuperEnalotto · draw
ResultSuperEnalotto
The crowdHeld about as often as an average linefrom the prize table, not from a model of how people pick
Top prizeNot wonnext draw advertised at
Rules6/90 + 1/90 · Dec 1997 – Jul 2009draw 472 of 1,425 under them
SourcesOnly Primary (commercial feed) reported this draw, so there is nothing to check it against. Settled 29 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC.
SuperEnalotto was a 6/90 + 1/90 · Dec 1997 – Jul 2009 game then. Everything on this page reads the draw against those rules and the 471 draws before it — not against today’s pool.
This draw, read by every tool
What the site’s explorations say about the numbers drawn on 5 June 2002 — each beside what chance predicted. None of it says anything about the next draw.
Scored 47 of 100 across six shape features — more typical than about 33% of every possible ticket.
Times drawn before — chance expected 31 of each
Every number was expected about that many times after 471 draws, and they scatter around it. Warm means more than expected, cool means fewer — and a cold number arriving is exactly what cold numbers do.
Frequency Explorer →Shares 2 of 6 numbers (41, 51) with the draw of 26 January 2002 — its closest relative in 471 draws. Chance gave a match this close a 100% likelihood somewhere in that history.
From the draw just before (1 June 2002): 85 carried over. Chance says 35% of draws repeat at least one number.
Carry-over / Déjà Vu →The numbers add up to 313 — the 73th percentile of all possible tickets, around a middle of 273. No two numbers side by side. 30% of draws have at least one such pair.
Sum Distribution →4 had not appeared for 51 draws. A number waits about 15 on average, and a wait this long was not a signal — the machine has no memory of it.
Gap & “Overdue” Tracker →A line like this is played about 0.6× as often as an average ticket — less popular than most. At 30 million tickets sold, a winner on these numbers would keep about 99% of the jackpot.
Illustrative model, calibrated to published studies — not live sales.
The Unpopular Numbers Edge →Where the money went
The rings take the ≈31M lines the counts imply and assume an evenly spread crowd. Furthest from that: Match 4 — 2,138 winners, 17% fewer than the 2.6k an even spread gives. The numbers drawn were a little less popular than average — that is the crowd, not the machine.
| Match | Winners | Prize each |
|---|---|---|
| Match 6 | 0 | €0.00 |
| Match 5 + Jolly | 1 | €5,119,316 |
| Match 5 | 16 | €75,355 |
| Match 4 | 2,138 | €564 |
| Match 3 | 90,552 | €13.31 |
| Totals | 0 | — |